Profilo di 瑞晶rochand的共享空间FotoBlogElenchiAltro Strumenti Guida

Blog


12/01/2008

关于抄袭

“背景:
Prof. Sterns 是耶鲁大学知名进化生物学家,本学期在北大开设Key Issues in Evolut
ion 和 Principles of Evolution 两门课程,总计40余名学生。 在12月初,有一位学生
交的期末论文中发现明显剽窃,为此教授公开宣布判此人零分并致函所有同学以示告诫。
然而所有论文都递交之后,又发现两人有严重剽窃行为。教授因此非常伤心,致函如下:……”
 
      我所能做的只是自己不抄袭。
      似乎不少抄袭的人都认为自己是因为学业压力过重,而不得不用这种更为快捷方便的手法完成任务。我确实反感抄袭这件事情,但我认为也有必要对背景做些考虑。比如从选课的角度来说,美国学生一学期只有四门课或更少,这使得他们完全有足够的精力与时间去认真地完成课程论文,而一个中国大学生一个学期往往会有八九门课程,尤其是文科课程,每门都会要求至少一篇论文(像中文教务要求必修课程两篇论文),而老师给的题目(主要是理论类课程)相比于同水平的美国教育往往也会显得空、大、虚。如果再加上双学位的课程,就一个正常人的精力而言,确实难以认真对待如此之多的内容。另外,尤其是对于理科生来说,由于中学时缺乏关于禁止抄袭的思想导向与警惕性教育,大学时期主要课程又较少涉及主观内容,这使得他们在对待一门通选课论文的时候,比之文科生更有可能发生抄袭的情况,而他们对此也往往不会负有太多的道德罪过感。
     但不论怎样,不管是学习还是从事学术性的工作,一个严肃对待抄袭问题的环境总是有好处的。即便是现在大学阶段,就我所知,因为害怕抄袭的缘故,也会在一定程度上造成学习交流的障碍。同专业间鲜少互相交流未完成的论文,因为没人会在从你那里得到启发后而在他的论文后面多加一个注解。很多老师对于抄袭的问题不太强调,也间接助长了抄袭风气,这使得抄袭者难以受到行为反馈的作用,——即使他因为抄袭的缘故而使成绩受到了影响,但他却可能对此全不知情,尤其是在成绩符合他的预期的情况下。而被抄袭者则好比是吃了一个有虫子的苹果,没看到也就算了,若是看到了那剩下一半的虫子,实在是除了“不爽”二字外也别无他法了。
     此外,就S教授所说的来看,40多个人的课,3个严重抄袭,还有几个有抄袭情节的,应该是个不小的比例了。另,我上的中国古代文化,林老师也就一次鉴赏作业的抄袭问题作了些数字上的粗略统计,亦不在少数。
 
以下文字为转载自北大未名BBS
 
发信人: yellowdream (05YP☆后庭花的和谐盛世掩不掉七十年国耻), 信区: Courses
标  题: 耶鲁教授 Stephen Stearns 致北大学生的一封信(转载)
发信站: 北大未名站 (2007年12月19日21:45:00 星期三), 转信

【 以下文字转载自 ypjh 讨论区 】
【 原文由 Ent 所发表 】

背景:
Prof. Sterns 是耶鲁大学知名进化生物学家,本学期在北大开设Key Issues in Evolut
ion 和 Principles of Evolution 两门课程,总计40余名学生。 在12月初,有一位学生
交的期末论文中发现明显剽窃,为此教授公开宣布判此人零分并致函所有同学以示告诫。
然而所有论文都递交之后,又发现两人有严重剽窃行为。教授因此非常伤心,致函如下:


To my students in Beijing, Fall 2007:

While grading papers today I encountered two more cases of plagiarism.
One was sophisticated but serious. The other was so blatant that it
was almost unbelievable. That makes a total of three students who
have failed my courses because of plagiarism.

If I had not warned you and given you the opportunity honestly to
correct your essays, there would have been several more. I thank those of
you who were honest and showed me what you had copied.

Plagiarism disturbs me greatly, both because it corrodes my relationship
with you as my students, and because it tells me things about China and
Beida that neither you nor I want to hear.

It corrodes my relationship with you because I work hard to be a good
teacher, I take time to prepare good lectures, and I spend many hours
providing detailed feedback on essays. It is hard work. You cannot
imagine what it is like to correct the details of the 500th essay until
you have done it yourself. I do that to help you
learn to think more clearly, to express yourself convincingly, and to
develop your intellectual power, your ability to understand the world.
I also do it because I value you, I value your ideas, and I think the world
will be a better place when you can all think clearly and behave
intelligently. Later in life, some of you will be leaders with important
positions. I want you to be competent and honest,
for I have seen too often what terrible can things can happen when
leaders are incompetent and dishonest. Leadership aside, I want all of you
to be able to create value in your lives, whatever you end up doing,
and you cannot do that if you deceive.

When a student whom I am teaching steals words and ideas from an
author without acknowledgment, I feel cheated, dragged down into the mud.
I ask myself, why should I teach people who knowingly deceive me?
Life is too short for such things. There are better things to do.

Disturbingly, plagiarism fits into a larger pattern of behavior in China.
China ignores international intellectual property rights. Beida sees
nothing wrong in copying my textbook, for example, in complete violation
of international copyright agreements, causing me to lose income,
stealing from me quite directly. No one in China seems to care.
I can buy DVDs in stores and on the street for about one US dollar.
They cost $20-30 outside China; the artists who produced them are
losing enormous amounts of stolen income, billions of dollars each year.
China has become notorious for producing defective products that have to
be recalled because the pose health threats to consumers. A recent cartoon in
 an
American newspaper shows the Central Committee reacting to an accusation that
they have violated human rights. The response? "Wait until they see what
we put in their toothpaste next!" Corruption is a serious problem in a boomin
g
economy. For example, in the mining industry, about 5000 miners die each year
and mine owners cut corners in violation of the law. The social fabric breaks
when workers die because owners are greedy. The Mandate of Heaven is lost.

China appears to have lost her way. Confucius said, do not
do to others what you do not want them to do to you. He also said, a
gentleman is honest. Honesty and reciprocity are the basis of trust and
community. We cannot get along in a world filled with deceit and defection;
such a world becomes a Hobbesian war of all against all, nasty and brutal.
We cannot do science if we cannot trust what others publish. There is no
reason to try to replicate a result if it cannot be trusted. It
would not be worth the effort. Without replication there can be no shared
knowledge that is tested and trustworthy - that is, no science. Without
science, there can be no technology. And without technology, there can be
no steady increase in productivity, economic growth, and a better life for al
l.

The penalties for plagiarism that you will encounter later in life are very
serious. If you do it as a graduate student, you can be expelled from
university, and you will not get your degree. If you do it as a faculty
member, you can lose your job. I know you may not believe that, for
the sociology professor at Beida who translated an entire book into Chinese
and published it with his name on it only lost his administrative positions
but kept his professorship and salary. But things are not like that elsewhere
.
When plagiarism is detected in the United States, it can end the
career of the person who did it. That is also true in Europe.

The fact that I have encountered this much plagiarism at Beida tells me
something about the behavior of other professors and administrators here.
They must tolerate a lot of it, and when they detect it, they cover it up
without serious punishment, probably because they do not want to lose face.
If they did punish it, it would not be this frequent.

I have greatly enjoyed teaching some of you. I have encountered young minds
here that are as good as any in the world. Many of you are brave, most
of you work very hard, most of you are honest, and some of you are brilliant.
But I am leaving with very mixed feelings. It is quite sad that so many
promising young Chinese think it is necessary to cheat to succeed. They
damage themselves even more than the people from whom they steal and the
people whom they deceive with stolen words.

Sincerely, Steve Stearns